Legal Opinion

Hill v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

[William Johnson brought a possessory warrant against A. W. ’Hill for the possession of a mare.

On the trial, Johnson swore that he was cultivating Hill’s land, and had conditionally bought the mare in controversy from Hill; that Johnson and Hill’s father after that got into,a dispute, and that Hill promised to let Johnson have the mare, and give him $25.00 if Johnson *363would not prosecute Hill’s father before the grand jury. After court, Hill refused to comply with his promise, and would not let Johnson have the mare, or pay him Ihe $25, and forbade his taking the mare off the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. FennellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Butler v. LazenbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Elrod v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. LoughbridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API