Legal Opinion

Sassman v. Aime

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the court of the first district.

1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.

The petitioner alleges that she is one of the heirs of the late John Brady, and as such, became entitled, by an amicable partition of the succession of her deceased father, to a certain piece of land, situated in the parish of St. Jean the Baptiste, containing ten arpents, or thereabouts, with the ordinary depth.

That at the time of said partition, viz. on the 18th day of October, 1805, the petitioner was the wife of John Sassman, and that property before mentioned, was her para*258phernal, or extra dotal effects. That she has never been divested of her right thereto, by her own consent, or by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. BerwickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1812

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Pontchartrain Rail Road v. DurelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  3. Wafer v. HemkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API