Legal Opinion

Nathan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 29, 1995No. CR-94-2117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cedric Cassis Nathan appeals from the circuit court's dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition in which he contested his 1993 convictions for first degree robbery and second degree burglary and his resulting concurrent life sentences.

In his petition, Nathan alleged the following grounds: (1) the evidence at trial that Willie Wimbley's dwelling was burglarized was a material variance from the averment in the indictment for burglary that Cedric Wimbley's dwelling was burglarized; (2) the evidence that the victim reasonably believed that Nathan was armed was a material variance from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jemison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Nathan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Barnes v. State Department of CorrectionsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API