Legal Opinion

Webb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1934No. 16766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for arson; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We notice appellant’s propositions in their order in the brief on file in his behalf. No process having been issued for the witness Rooker, who was absent, and for whom a continuance . was sought, — and the only diligence appearing being that Rooker had promised to come when written to, and that a letter had been so written to him, there was no error in denying appellant’s application for continuance. In each case cited by appellant, due diligence was shown. None here appears. Smith v. State, 97 Texas Crim. Rep.,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Countee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. State v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API