In re the Estate of Fowler

Page, S.

Petitioner in the above-entitled proceeding was duly awarded costs on appeal to the Court of Appeals. (288 N. Y. 697; 289 N. Y. 756.) Pursuant to notice, which he had previously duly given to each of the attorneys for the other parties in this proceeding, the attorney for the petitioner, on March 31, 1943, presented a proposed bill of costs for the purpose of taxation.

There is no question of petitioner’s right to a proper bill of *787costs, nor any question as to such costs’ being assessable against the respondent, George W. Fowler, personally. Both of these questions were determined in…