Legal Opinion

Paschke v. Stoller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

A number of errors are assigned by the defendant, but since the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint upon the merits, all of them need not be discussed. The chief evidence of ownership of the note produced by the plaintiff was the order of the court declaring her to be the owner thereof. But that order was made in a proceeding in which the defendant was not a party and therefore it was not binding upon him, and his objection to the reception of the evidence should have been sustained. Landauer v. Espenhain, 95 Wis. 169, 70 N. W. 287;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Sturbridge v. FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Landauer v. EspenhainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sawyer v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbia River Door Co. v. TimmsOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API