Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pillsbury

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1915No. S.F. No. 6993PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPLICATION originally made to the Supreme Court for a Writ of Review directed to the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The Industrial Accident Commission of California entertained jurisdiction in the case where an employee of the petitioner met his death by accident while engaged in his usual occupation. It made an award in conformity with our law to the widow of the deceased. The probative facts are not in controversy. The deceased was a truck builder and a repairer of trucks for locomotives. He was so employed in petitioners’ roundhouse No. 1 at Roseville, California. At the time of the accident which caused his death he was engaged in repairing switch engine No. 1173 in roundhouse No. 1. This roundhouse…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Martin Ship Service Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Boteler v. Gardiner-Buick Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API