Jones v. Ironton Garage Co.

This was an action below in replevin, but the property was not taken possession of by the garage company, because no bond was given, and the action proceeded as one for damages.

The chief principle involved, and the only one argued before this court, is 'that of a waiver of a lien for labor and materials. The waiver was not pleaded, though the want of such pleading has not been argued or presented to us.

One Deffner owned an automobile and placed it with the garage company for repairs. Labor and materials were expended upon it to the amount of $41.70. The plaintiff in error Wilbur Jones…