Legal Opinion

Untermeyer v. Freund

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Equity. Bill for infringement óf a patent for a design.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

This is an equity action of infringement, founded upon letters patent No. 15,121, granted to the complainant July 1, 1884, for a design for watch-cases. The design consists of a central conventional star, in which any ornament may be set, placed upon a larger star of leaves, both stars being in bas-relief. Between the points of the star of loaves are diamond-shaped projections. The design was the result of considerable effort and industry. It shows some genius, and it soon became popular with the public, and a source of profit to those who adopted it. The claims are as follows:

“(1) A design…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Wood v. DolbyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Zhang v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Phœnix Knitting Works v. Bradley Knitting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
  4. General Gaslight Co. v. Matchless Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
  5. Biggs v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API