Legal Opinion

Dawes v. Rosenbaum

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judg'e, presiding".

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

By its finding of facts the Appellate Court found that the agent of the bank who made demand on appellees for the cattle in question knew at the time he made the demand that appellees had sold and accounted with Hudson for the proceeds of the sale of the cattle, and that the agent of the bank made no inquiry of appellees, or any of them, as to the vendee of the cattle, or who had control of them, or as to where they were, and that the demand was made solely for the purpose of holding appellees liable for them. Concurring, as we do, with the Appellate Court, its judgment must be affirmed, as,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. ZibellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  2. First National Bank v. SweglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. St. Paul Cattle Loan Co. v. HansmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  4. C. E. White & Co. v. Century Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  5. National Bond & Investment Co. v. MossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API