Legal Opinion

In Re Lane

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1890No. 12. OriginalPublishedCited by 41 opinions

ORIGINAL. This was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The ease is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This is a petition by Charles’ Mason Lane, addressed to the original jurisdiction of this court, for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon the filing of the petition a rule was issued upon .Charles Ii. Case, warden of the penitentiary of the State of Kansas, who, it was alleged, held the petitioner in unlawful imprisonment. Case made a return to this rule, in which he said that the prisoner was held under a mittimus issued from the office of the clerk of the District Court of the United States in and for the District of Kansas, and accompanying the return was a certified copy of the proceedings in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re GreeneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1892
  2. New York Ex Rel. Kopel v. BinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. United States v. NoveckSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Wheatley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  5. Tracy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API