Legal Opinion

Moody v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 29, 1933No. 1306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

Mrs. E. L. Moody, joined pro forma by her husband, filed application in the probate court to probate the will of M. E. Hogan, deceased, her former husband. The will was contested by H. L. Hogan, a son of the deceased. On appeal in the district court, the jury found that the will was executed as the result of undue influence exercised by Mrs. E. L. Moody, who was the principal devisee in the will. The court entered a judgment denying the probate of the will, and proponents appealed.

It was a sharply contested issue as to whether Mrs. Moody had compelled or unduly influenced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robbins v. WynneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. McMahan v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. First Nat. Bank of Merkel v. HarkriderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API