Commonwealth v. Hellertown Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
*154Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
I must respectfully dissent. Because of the Heller-town Manufacturing Company’s somewhat unique nature, I do not believe that it transacted business outside of the Commonwealth, and I do not believe that any portion of Hellertown’s receipts was negotiated or effected outside of the Commonwealth.
I
It is my view that Hellertown does not transact any portion of its business outside of the Commonwealth. As the wholly-owned subsidiary of its only customer, Hellertown exists solely at the whim of its parent. And as a company bereft of any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Com. v. SAFE HARBOR WP CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965