Legal Opinion
In re Read
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 19, 2014No. 14-21614-svkPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION
SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Beth Ann Read (the “Debtor”) was not contributing to a retirement account when she filed her Chapter 13 case. Post-petition, she started making monthly contributions to a 401(k) account established by her employer. The Trustee objected to confirmation of her Chapter 13 plan, contending that, because of the retirement contributions, the Debtor is not dedicating all projected disposable income to her unsecured creditors as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b).
Statement of Facts
The facts are straightforward…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Baxter, Barnee v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
- Deborah Seafort v. Beverly BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Burden v. Seafort (In Re Seafort)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re CantuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- In re MelendezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- In re VanlandinghamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Miner v. JohnsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018
- John Penfound v. David RuskinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.