Behymer v. Cook
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, under Sec. 28, Ch. Lili, Gen. Laws, to recover three tifnes the value of certain property seized by the defendant as sheriff, under a writ of attachment, it being alleged that a portion of the property was exempt from levy and sale, under the sixth subdivision of Sec. 26 of the same chapter.
This section provides that “ The following property, when owned by any person being the head of a family, and residing with the same, shall be exempt from levy and sale upon any execution or writ of attachment, or distress…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Harrington v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Weil v. NevittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- In Re RadeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Autrey v. WrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Madera v. HoldregeColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.