Legal Opinion

Howard v. United Serum Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The Waterloo Serum Laboratories, Inc., was a corporation organized by Dr. Cecil; as its sole incorporator and stockholder and manager. It is represented here by a receiver, but, for the purpose of our discussion, we shall refer to the corporation itself as the plaintiff. The plaintiff handled hog cholera serum and virus, as a retail dealer, and was located at Waterloo. In January, 1920, it entered into a written contract of purchase of this hog cholera remedy from the defendant. The contention presented is that the product delivered to it by the defendant was impure, in that it contained the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richards v. H. K. Mulford Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Murphy v. Sioux Falls Serum Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brown v. H. K. Mulford Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Hollingsworth v. Midwest Serum Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Eagle Biological & Supply Co. v. BreedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Tremaine, Exrx. v. H. K. Mulford Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Parker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Denman v. ARMOUR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API