Legal Opinion
Estate of Rose
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1928No. Docket No. 6237PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETCH, J., pro tem.
Emmason C. Rose, the husband of appellant herein, died June 10, 1927, in the city of Los Angeles. Prior thereto he executed two holographic wills, one dated April 16, 1927, and the other June 4, 1927—the latter six days prior to his death. The will of April 16th reads as follows:
“I, Emmason C. Rose, being of sound and disposing mind and healthy body, herewith declare this my last will and testament and declare all others null and void.
“First: I direct that my wife, Betty S. Rose, be appointed executor and administrator of this my last will and testament and that she serve…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Le Breton v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wollesen v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lasier v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Estate of O'GormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Estate of AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- De Paul v. IrwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997