Kim v. Rosenthal

Sarah S. Kim appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying her petition for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, and her complaint for relief in the nature of certiorari and mandamus pursuant to G. L. c. 249, §§ 4 and 5 (collectively, petition). We affirm.

Sarah S. Kim, pro se.

In November, 2012, the respondent, Lloyd Rosenthal, commenced a summary process action against Kim in the District Court. Kim’s condominium unit had been foreclosed upon, and Rosenthal was the new owner. 2 The court ruled in Rosenthal’s favor, and Kim appealed to the Appellate Division of the…