Legal Opinion

Conn v. Starr

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 1, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These exceptions arise out of a will contest tried to a jury in the Superior Court on an issue framed by the Probate Court, which was as follows: “Was the instrument propounded for probate as the last will of said Willis E. Gowen procured to be made by the fraud or undue influence of Willis M. Gowen exercised upon the said Willis E. Gowen?” The jury’s answer to this question was “No” and the case is here on the contestant’s exceptions to various rulings made"during the trial.

The evidence pro and con on the issue of undue influence need not be set forth. For a background to an understanding of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mowry v. NormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Eddy v. EddyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Bodine v. BodineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Davenport v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erb v. LeeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Markus v. GrossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API