Legal Opinion

Noble v. Peebles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1825PublishedCited by 1 opinion

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford county. Debt by William Peebles, the plaintiff below, and defendant in error, against John Noble, the defendant below, and plaintiff in error, in which the plaintiff demanded by his declaration five hundred dollars, upon an award between the parties.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford county. Debt by William Peebles, the plaintiff below, and defendant in error, against John Noble, the defendant below, and plaintiff in error, in which the plaintiff demanded by his declaration five hundred dollars, upon an award between the parties. By the submission, the parties, on the 29th.of April, 1817, agreed “to have all business, civil and state, in dispute, referred to five persons, (named therein,) to determine between them, and whatever report the said referees agreed upon, the said parties agreed to bind themselves, in the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tilghman, C. J.

This is an aetion brought by William Peebles, the plaintiff below, and defendant in error, against John Noble, the plaintiff in error, for the penalty of five hundred dollars, in which the parties mutually bound themselves, each to the other, for the performance of such award as should be made by certain arbitrators, to whom were referred “ all business, civil and state, in dispute between the said parties.” Several errors have been assigned, in none of which is there any weight, but one, viz. that the award is void, il because made on…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orcutt v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API