Legal Opinion
Housh v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 28, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The writ of error brings for review judgment in habeas corpus proceedings remanding petitioner to the custody of the Chief of Police of the City of Arcadia.
It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the affidavit on which the plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the municipal court of the City of Arcadia which was in the following language: "Before me, Claud C. Jones, Mayor of the City of Arcadia, personally came Bunk McGuire who being duly sworn says that on the 4th day of June, A.D. 1936, in the City of Arcadia, aforesaid, one George Housh did sell intoxicating liquor…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. State Ex Rel. RaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- J. Schnarr & Co. v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State, Ex Rel. Hoffman v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trujillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Florio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- State ex rel. Phillips v. Municipal Court, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1970