Legal Opinion
Lawrence R. v. Muriel R.
New York City Family Court
Decided October 5, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. McLaughlin, J.
The above-named petitioner was the original defendant in a matrimonial action which resulted in a decree of divorce being entered by the Supreme Court of this county on January 18, 1974. The alimony provision of that divorce decree was made into an order of the Family Court on December 2, 1974, as a result of the filing of a Family Court petition to enforce the provisions of the decree. The petitioner now seeks to modify the Family Court order pursuant to section 171 of the Family Court Act. The alimony provision itself was originally contained in a separate agreement entered into by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kover v. KoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Swartz v. SwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Windwer v. WindwerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Windwer v. WindwerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Weiner v. WeinerNew York City Family Court · 1979
- Villano v. VillanoNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Wiesenfeld v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Wiesenfeld v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979