Legal Opinion
Kanbar v. Quad Cinema Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 20, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered August 29, 1989, modified by granting petitioner’s motion to the extent of adjudging Fred C. Daniels in contempt and imposing a fine of $37,067.90; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.
Order entered May 25,1989 affirmed, with $10 costs.
Petitioner landlord appeals from orders denying his motion to punish respondents for contempt for their refusal to obey a restraining notice issued in connection with the enforcement of a judgment for use and occupancy and attorney’s fees entered in summary proceedings. Civil Court, in separate orders, found the corporate…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- McCormick v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- N. A. Development Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Puro v. PuroNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Puro v. PuroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Tri-State Investors Corp. v. KitchingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
4Cited by2 opinions
- Kanbar v. Quad Cinema Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Matter of Wimbledon Fin. Master Fund, Ltd. v. BergsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019