Legal Opinion

City of Fort Wayne v. Patterson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1900No. 3,100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

—The appellee, as administrator of the estate of Patrick Sheeliy, deceased, brought his action against the appellant to recover for the death of his intestate. Three paragraphs of complaint were held sufficient on demurrer. In the first paragraph, it was in substance alleged (omitting introductory matter), that on and before the 24th of May, 1897, the appellant owned and operated a system of water-works in the city of Fort Wayne, used to supply the citizens with water, in consideration of compensation paid by them, by way of a specific tax known as water rent; that in order to extend said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kranz v. Long Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. McKee v. TourtellotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Breen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Harrod v. State ex rel. MeloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fort Wayne Iron & Steel Co. v. ParsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. AderIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Flutmus v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API