Legal Opinion

Catholic Mut. Relief Soc'y of Am. v. Arrowood Indem. Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 10, 2018No. Civil No. 17-3141 (JRT/LIB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tunheim, Chief Judge

This action arises out of a dispute between two insurers of the same insured party. The Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America ("Catholic Mutual") brought this case for declaratory judgment against Arrowood Indemnity Company ("Arrowood"). Catholic Mutual issued insurance coverage certificates to the Diocese of St. Cloud ("the Diocese") and other parishes ("the Parishes") for periods during which they were also allegedly covered by policies issued by Arrowood's predecessor company. For decades, Arrowood's predecessor company acknowledged responsibility under those policies for sexual abuse…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Titus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minnesota Minority Trades Council and Bush Companies v. Nancy Daubenberger, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; Robin Hutcheson, in her official capacity as Chair of the Metropolitan Council; Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration; and the State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  2. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local No. 663 v. Seneca Foods CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API