Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Ford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Superior Oowrt of Denver.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hayt

At a time prior to the year 1883, George W. Clayton and William Clayton, then being the owners in fee of lots 24 and 26, block 48, east division of the city of Denver, leased the same to plaintiff in error, Paul T. Hughes, for a term expiring June 1, 1883. By the terms of said lease all improvements erected by plaintiff were to remain his property. Thereafter plaintiff entered into possession of the premises and erected thereon certain buildings. Upon the expiration of the term of the lease, plaintiff, by the consent of *331the Claytons, held over upon the original terms. On or about November 21,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKemie v. WaldropCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API