Legal Opinion

Fuller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1923No. 3819PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Acting Associate Justice

(sitting in place of VAN ORS-DEE, Associate Justice). The appellant hereinafter referred to as the defendant was tried in the Supreme Court of the District on an indictment in two counts; the first alleging the forging and the second the'uttering of' a written instrument in the form of a promissory note. *443By direction of the court a verdict of not guilty was returned on the first count. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of uttering on the second count. Judgment and sentence followed.

The note was described in the first count as follows:

“$5,000.00 Washington, D. C., Oct.' 18, 1918.
“Ninety…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Metcalf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Skiskowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Dixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API