Legal Opinion

Voight v. Fidelity Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1908No. 7173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 14, 1907, upon granting a nonsuit, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action by the appellant against the respondent, to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The contract of sale upon which the complaint was based was made and entered into on the 8th day of September, 1903, and was, in substance, to the *613effect that the defendant contracted to sell certain land in King county to the plaintiff for the sum of $1,000, $100 to be paid down at the office of the defendant, $100 on the 10th day of each and every sixth month thereafter until the sum of $1,000 had been paid in full, together with interest at the rate of seven…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stein v. WaddellWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reese v. WestfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Benham v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lewis v. WellardWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hallauer v. CertainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Schoneman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API