Legal Opinion

In re a Proposal or Plan by Mortgage Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

To the extent that this motion seeks to compel the filing of certain amendatory resolutions and “ transactions,” it is denied. The fifing of the original resolutions was voluntary on the part of respondent, and was not required by law or otherwise.

*638In so far as a discovery and inspection is sought, the motion is likewise denied, it appearing from the answering affidavits that the alleged documents whose discovery and inspection is desired do not exist.

There remains for consideration petitioner’s application for an examination before trial. In so far as the examination is sought in aid of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brenner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canter v. American Cyanimid Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re a Proposal or Plan by Mortgage CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API