Legal Opinion

Wetter v. United Hydraulic Cotton Press Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Wills. Title. Estates. Bes Adjudicata. Marriage Settlements. Before Judge Adams. .Chatham Superior Court. June Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Judge.

This is an action of ejectment in the usual form, brought by Edward T. Wetter, Louisa A. Gould, formerly Louisa A. Wetter, and Louis Knorr, as administrator upon the estate of Conrad and Meta Wetter, deceased, against the United Hydraulic Cotton Compress Company, to recover a wharf lot in Savannah, known as number fourteen. The following is a statement of the facts upon which the plaintiffs rely to establish their title: The said Edward T., Louisa A., Conrad and Meta Wetter were the only children of Augustus P. and Sarah Alberta Wetter. The last named was the daughter of Mary E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Knorr v. RaymondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Toomer v. DickersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  4. Burton v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Matthews v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API