Legal Opinion

Ertel v. Demmon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 10, 2006No. AC 26104Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Peter H. Ertel, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the court’s judgment, which did not contain an award of prejudgment interest.1 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in denying the motion. Our law makes clear that the opening of a judgment is entirely within the discretion of the trial court. See Moore v. Brancard, 89 Conn. App. 129, 131, 872 A.2d 909 (2005). We note, however, that “[although the opening of a judgment properly rendered is a discre*116tionary act of the court ... a judgment improperly rendered,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Wendt v. WendtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. St. JohnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Moore v. BrancardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API