Legal Opinion

Hatt v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 28, 1969No. Docket Nos. 5225-66, 5226-66UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herbert G. Hatt v. Commissioner. The Albert Johann & Sons Company, Inc. v. Commissioner.

Hatt v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 5225-66, 5226-66.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1969-229; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 66; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 1194; T.C.M. (RIA) 69229;

October 28, 1969. Filed

Russell G. Lloyd, for the petitioners. Eugene M. Corbin, for the respondent.

FEATHERSTON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FEATHERSTON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax in the cases of petitioners Herbert G. Hatt (hereinafter referred to as Hatt) and The Albert Johann & Sons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Carlos and Jacqueline Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph, Jr. And Anastasia Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bob Jones University v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Herbert G. Hatt and the Albert Johann & Sons Company, Inc. v. Commissiomer of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API