Legal Opinion

Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Malone

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1931No. 2920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Moran, District Judge:

It is the contention of the petitioner that the state engineer should, upon request, take charge of the division and distribution of the waters of the Quinn River stream system pursuant to the decree of the Humboldt County district court.

The contention of the respondent is that, as the decree in question does not constitute a statutory adjudication pursuant to the 1913 water law, as amended, no such duty on the part of the respondent arises by reason of such decree.

The petitioner urges in his brief that there are two distinct methods whereby water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ormsby County v. KearneyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wattles v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. McCormick v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. CITY OF RENO v. DIST. CT. (CONRAD) (CIVIL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API