Legal Opinion

245 Realty Associates v. Sussis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 27, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated November 21, 1995 affirmed, with $10 costs.

Landlord’s holdover petition was dismissed after trial upon Civil Court’s finding that respondent Donald M. Sussis was entitled to succeed to the rent-stabilized tenancy of his deceased brother (Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2523.5 [b] [1]). The lease to the decedent, as renewed, contained an enforceable attorneys’ fees provision. In reliance upon Matter of Duell v Condon (84 NY2d 773), respondent seeks to recover his attorneys’ fees pursuant to Real Property Law § 234 as the prevailing party in the eviction…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Duell v. CondonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Sullivan v. Brevard AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. East Four-Forty Associates v. EwellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1988

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Classic Properties v. MartinezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API