Legal Opinion

State v. Barden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 2008No. A-23 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLACE, JR.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case, the trial court admitted evidence that defendant sold drugs to co-defendant over a six-month period prior to the robbery under a theory of res gestae. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed, but held that the other-crimes evidence was properly admitted under N.J.R.E. 404(b) to show defendant’s motive with respect to the crimes charged and that the corresponding limiting instruction was appropriate. We granted certification “limited solely to the question of whether testimony that defendant sold drugs to the co-defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. CofieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. State v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. State v. StevensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. Vonte Skinner (071764)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. State v. GillispieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. State v. SterlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  5. State v. Carl J. Garrison(076537)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API