Legal Opinion

Sheila Rouse v. Boehringer Mannheim Corporation Christopher Hildebrand

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1997No. 96-1553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

In 1988 Sheila Rouse was hired as a sales representative by Boehringer Mannheim Corporation (BMC). Rouse claims she was denied a promotion on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and in breach of an employment agreement with BMC. The contract claim was dismissed on summary judgment, and the Title VII claim went to trial. The district court 1 issued sixty-four pages of findings and conclusions after trial, and judgment was entered in favor of BMC. Rouse appeals from the judgment, and we affirm.

On appeal, Rouse challenges many of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. French v. Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Alston v. BROWN TRANSPORT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Jane Doe v. Boyd A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Automobile Club of New Mexico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Fredregill v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API