Legal Opinion

Stuart Studio, Inc. v. National School of Heavy Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1975No. 7518SC49PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

On appeal from the granting of a motion for directed verdict this Court must determine if plaintiff has made out a case sufficient to go to the jury, and plaintiff’s evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to it. Wilson v. Miller, 20 N.C. App. 156, 201 S.E. 2d 55 (1973).

The North Carolina Statute of Frauds, a substantial prototype of the historic English statute, 29 Charles II (1676) Ch. 3, Sec. 4, contains the provision that “no action shall be brought . . . upon a special promise to answer the debt ... of another person, unless the agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Warren v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Wilson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. May v. CHARLES C. HAYNES, JR., CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Builder Appliance Supply, Inc. v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Terrell v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc. v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Brown v. Artisan 2510, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Lyvere v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API