Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 2004No. 4D02-4611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant moved to correct his sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, but the trial court failed to rule within sixty days as required under the rule. Thus, the motion was deemed denied. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(1)(B). Although the court later granted the motion and reduced his sentence, that order is considered a nullity. See Cliatt v. State, 773 So.2d 610, 611 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Nevertheless, in case number 01-14442, the state concedes that appellant’s sentence should have been reduced to nine months, as the trial court did in its untimely…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cliatt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dabel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API