Legal Opinion

Goughenour v. Campbell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1971No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

Robert and Grace Campbell had entrusted their son Brace with the custody and control of their automobile. Brace, in turn, entrusted its custody and control to Constance Steigerwald, who was operating the vehicle at the time it went out of control, crossed the center of the highway into the lane of oncoming traffic, and struck a vehicle being operated by one Helen Bell. One of the passengers in the Campbell car driven by Constance Steigerwald was Donna Fay Goughenour, a minor, who by her guardian, instituted this suit against Constance Steigerwald on the basis of her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Coppage v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Usner v. DuersmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Sheriff v. EiseleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Del Boring Tire Service, Inc. v. Barr MacHine, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Bell v. Gerber, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1972
  4. Christine v. Howard T. Maker & Smith Transfer Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1978
  5. Pennzoil United, Inc. v. Oakes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API