Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-1305Published

1Dissent

Judge Timmons-Goodson

dissenting.

Respectfully, I dissent. While I believe that the evidence presented by the State was sufficient to permit the jury to find that Mr. Hightower was murdered during the commission of an armed robbery, I do not believe that the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that defendant perpetrated these crimes. Therefore, the trial court should have allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge of first-degree murder.

A motion to dismiss is properly denied only “[i]f there is substantial evidence — whether direct, circumstantial, or both — to support a finding that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. SextonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API