Legal Opinion
People v. Echevarria
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*546By limiting courtroom closure solely to the duration of the trial testimony of two undercover police officers, and by noting that it would separately consider opening the proceeding to defendant’s family members if any requested access to the courtroom during the period of closure, the trial court discharged its duty to consider reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding (see Presley v Georgia, 558 US —, —, 130 S Ct 721, 724 [2010]; People v Mickens, 82 AD3d 430 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 798 [2011]; People v Manning, 78 AD3d 585, 586 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 861 [2011], cert denied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. JobNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. ManningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MickensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. EchevarriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. GarayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GarayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013