Legal Opinion
Hudson United Bank v. Chase Manhattan Bank of Connecticut, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-5279UnknownCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
There are two interrelated issues in this appeal. First, whether the venue provision of the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIR-REA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(6)(A) (Supp. II 1990), 1 governs only actions brought against the failed depository institution or whether it also applies to actions against the institution’s receiver. Second, whether the claims procedures established in FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d), cover actions against the receiver as well as actions against the failed institution.
This ease arises out of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hudson United Bank v. Chase Manhattan Bank of Connecticut, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994