Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Wyeth

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided October 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 1:04CV701TSL-MTPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*490 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TOM S. LEE, District Judge.

Defendants Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively Wyeth) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment on the basis of the statute of limitations. Plaintiff Rose Alexander has responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that the motion should be denied.

Plaintiff Rose Alexander alleges that from 1991 until April 1996, she took Premarin, a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drug…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Balfour v. Jackson HMA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024
  2. Luckett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API