Legal Opinion
Silbowitz v. Silbowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Although a court may properly appoint a parenting coordina*688tor to mediate between parties and oversee the implementation of their court-ordered parenting plan (see generally Berg v Berg, 85 AD3d 952 [2011]; Raviv v Raviv, 64 AD3d 638, 639 [2009]; Ragone v Ragone, 62 AD3d 772, 772-773 [2009]) a court may not delegate to a parenting coordinator the authority to resolve issues affecting the best interests of the children (see Matter of Edwards v Rothschild, 60 AD3d 675, 678 [2009]; see also Matter of Henderson v Henderson, 9 AD3d 569 [2004]; Matter of Hirsch v Hirsch, 4 AD3d 451, 452 [2004];…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwards v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Lynch v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hirsch v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Berg v. BergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Henderson v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Juan R.H.P. v. Wendy B.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of Juan R.H.P. v. Wendy B.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of Narine v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024