Legal Opinion

Houston v. Leyden Motor Coach Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1968No. Gen. 52,351PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

The defendant appeals from an order sustaining the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury’s answer to the special interrogatory and to grant a new trial. It was stipulated by both parties that the trial court’s sole reason for setting aside the special finding was that the special finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The only contention now raised by the defendant is that the special finding was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and, therefore, its motion to enter judgment on the special finding in favor of the defendant should have been granted.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Finley v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. Freeman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Peach v. PeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Borries v. Z. Frank, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pasko v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Martin v. Kralis Poultry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. First Nat. Bank of Elgin v. SzwankowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Phillips v. Shell Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Ruggiero v. Public Taxi Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API