Phyllis Maness v. K & A Enterprises of Mississippi, LLC

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, SPECIALLY CONCURRING:

¶ 67. I write separately to address the Manesses' so-called motions "for reconsideration." While a harmless issue here, this case illustrates the confusion often created by such motions.

¶ 68. Technically, "[t]he Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for a motion for reconsideration." McBride v. McBride , 110 So.3d 356 , 359 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013). Rule 54(b) does makes clear that a decision, order, or judgment that disposes of less than all claims by all parties is interlocutory and therefore "is subject to revision at any time before the…