Legal Opinion

The King v. Joe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

The defendants were at the last term of this Court convicted by the jury, on their appeal, on a charge of violating Chapter 40 of the Laws of 1886, by being found by night without lawful excuse in or upon the enclosed yard or houses of the Kapiolani Home in Honolulu. At the close of the case for the prosecution, the defendants’ counsel moved the Court to discharge the defendants on the following grounds :(1) That the law under which the defendants are charged is unconstitutional.(2) That there is no evidence that either or both of the defendants are vagrants,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
  2. Damon v. Shinjiro TsutsuiHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Gunzaga v. Kaiwiki Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API