Legal Opinion
The Hartbridge.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 11, 1932No. 326PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties to this appeal entered into an arbitration agreement which provided that a judgment on the award might be entered in the court below, as authorized by the United States Arbitration Act § 9 (9 USCA § 9). On November 6, 1931, by a majority decision, the arbitrators made an award in favor of the appellee, North of England Steamship Company, Limited. Upon due notice a motion to confirm the award came on for hearing on December 1st. In opposition the appellant filed af fidavits challenging the court's jurisdiction to confirm the award before February 6, 1932, because section 12 of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re the Arbitration of PickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Shores v. BowenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Gaines v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Hinkle v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 135 v. Jefferson Trucking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corporation and Steven HylenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.