Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1980No. 59141Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I reject the majority’s conclusion that the arresting officer could amend the warrant in the instant case by receiving permission to do so over the telephone from the issuing magistrate. I respectfully dissent.

There is no doubt that, under the facts of this case, appellee’s hotel room could not be lawfully searched without a valid warrant. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 454-455 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); Love v. State, 144 Ga. App. 728, 731-732 (242 SE2d 278) (1978). The validity of the search is dependent upon the validity of the warrant.

The majority correctly points…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Houser v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Steele v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API