Legal Opinion

Ling v. Whittemore

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1959No. 18354PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

The plantiff in error, who will be herein referred to as Ling, seeks review and reversal of a judgment of the district court entered upon a jury verdict awarding defendant in error, who was plaintiff in the district court and who will be herein referred to as Whittemore, $3,000.00 of which $1,500.00 was actual and $1,500.00 exemplary damages. The claim was in defamation and originally alleged that the defendant had perpetrated the defamation by a writing. This theory was changed at the trial and the case was submitted to the jury on the plaintiff’s theory that the defendant had slandered him.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hemmens v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Denver Public Warehouse Co. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Melcher v. BeelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Combes v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gattis v. Kilgo.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Pittman v. Larson Distributing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Abrahamsen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Walters v. LinhofDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API